Chapter 9 : The Swiss Reformer


In the choice of instrumentalities for the reforming of the church,
the same divine plan is seen as in that for the planting of the church.
The heavenly Teacher passed by the great men of earth, the titled
and wealthy, who were accustomed to receive praise and homage as
leaders of the people. They were so proud and self-confident in their
boasted superiority that they could not be moulded to sympathize

with their fellow-men, and to become co-laborers with the humble
Man of Nazareth. To the unlearned, toiling fishermen of Galilee was
the call addressed, “Follow me, and I will make you fishers of men.”
[Matthew 4:19.] These disciples were humble and teachable. The
less they had been influenced by the false teaching of their time, the
more successfully could Christ instruct and train them for his service.
So in the days of the Great Reformation. The leading reformers
were men from humble life,—men who were most free of any of
their time from pride of rank, and from the influence of bigotry
and priestcraft. It is God’s plan to employ humble instruments to
accomplish great results. Then the glory will not be given to men,
but to Him who works through them to will and to do of his own
good pleasure.

A few weeks after the birth of Luther in a miner’s cabin in
Saxony, Ulric Zwingle was born in a herdsman’s cottage among the
Alps. Zwingle’s surroundings in childhood, and his early training,
were such as to prepare him for his future mission. Reared amid
scenes of natural grandeur, beauty, and awful sublimity, his mind
was early impressed with a sense of the greatness, the power, and
[172] the majesty of God. The history of the brave deeds achieved upon
his native mountains, kindled his youthful aspirations. And at the
side of his pious grandmother he listened to the few precious Bible
stories which she had gleaned from amid the legends and traditions
of the church. With eager interest he heard of the grand deeds of
patriarchs and prophets, of the shepherds who watched their flocks


on the hills of Palestine where angels talked with them, of the Babe
of Bethlehem and the Man of Calvary.
Like John Luther, Zwingle’s father desired an education for his
son, and the boy was early sent from his native valley. His mind
rapidly developed, and it soon became a question where to find teachers
competent to instruct him. At the age of thirteen he went to Bern,
which then possessed the most distinguished school in Switzerland.
Here, however, a danger arose which threatened to blight the promise
of his life. Determined efforts were put forth by the friars to allure
him into a monastery. The Dominican and Franciscan monks were
in rivalry for popular favor. This they endeavored to secure by the
showy adornments of their churches, the pomp of their ceremonials,
and the attractions of famous relics and miracle-working images.

The Dominicans of Bern saw that if they could win this talented
young scholar, they would secure both gain and honor. His extreme
youth, his natural ability as a speaker and a writer, and his genius
for music and poetry, would be more effective than all their pomp
and display, in attracting the people to their services and increasing
the revenues of their order. By deceit and flattery they endeavored
to induce Zwingle to enter their convent. Luther while a student at
school had buried himself in a convent cell, and he would have been
lost to the world had not God’s providence released him. Zwingle
was not permitted to encounter the same peril. Providentially his
father received information of the designs of the friars. He had no
intention of allowing his son to follow the idle and worthless life
of the monks. He saw that his future usefulness was at stake, and [173]
directed him to return home without delay.

The command was obeyed; but the youth could not be long content
in his native valley, and he soon resumed his studies, repairing,
after a time, to Basel. It was here that Zwingle first heard the gospel
of God’s free grace. Wittembach, a teacher of the ancient languages,
had, while studying Greek and Hebrew, been led to the Holy Scriptures,
and thus rays of divine light were shed into the minds of the
students under his instruction. He declared that there was a truth
more ancient, and of infinitely greater worth, than the theories taught
by schoolmen and philosophers. This ancient truth was that the
death of Christ is the sinner’s only ransom. To Zwingle these words
were as the first ray of light that precedes the dawn.

Zwingle was soon called from Basel, to enter upon his life-work.
His first field of labor was in an Alpine parish, not far distant from
his native valley. Having received ordination as a priest, “he devoted
himself with his whole soul to the search after divine truth; for he
was well aware,” says a fellow-reformer, “how much he must know
to whom the flock of Christ is intrusted.” The more he searched the
Scriptures, the clearer appeared the contrast between their truths and
the heresies of Rome. He submitted himself to the Bible as the word
of God, the only sufficient, infallible rule. He saw that it must be its
own interpreter. He dared not attempt to explain Scripture to sustain
a preconceived theory or doctrine, but held it his duty to learn what
is its direct and obvious teaching. He sought to avail himself of
every help to obtain a full and correct understanding of its meaning,
and he invoked the aid of the Holy Spirit, which would, he declared,
reveal it to all who sought it in sincerity and with prayer.

“The Scriptures,” said Zwingle, “come from God, not from man.
Even that God who enlightens will give thee to understand that the
[174] speech comes from God. The Word of God ... cannot fail. It is
bright, it teaches itself, discloses itself, it illumines the soul with all
salvation and grace, comforts it in God, humbles it, so that it loses
and even forfeits itself, and embraces God.” The truth of these words
Zwingle himself had proved. Speaking of his experience at this time,
he afterward wrote: “When I began to give myself wholly up to the
Holy Scriptures, philosophy and theology (scholastic) would always
keep suggesting quarrels to me. At last I came to this, that I thought,
‘Thou must let all that lie, and learn the meaning of God purely out
of his own simple Word.’ Then I began to ask God for his light, and
the Scriptures began to be much easier to me.”

The doctrine preached by Zwingle was not received from Luther.
It was the doctrine of Christ. “If Luther preaches Christ,” said the
Swiss reformer, “he does what I do. He has led to Christ many more
souls than I;—be it so. Yet will I bear no other name than that of
Christ, whose soldier I am, and who alone is my head. Never has a
single line been addressed by me to Luther, or by Luther to me. And
why?—That it might be manifest to all how uniform is the testimony
of the Spirit of God, since we, who have had no communication with
each other, agree so closely in the doctrine of Jesus Christ.”

In 1516 Zwingle was invited to become a preacher in the convent
at Einsiedeln. Here he was to have a closer view of the corruptions
of Rome, and was to exert an influence as a reformer that would
be felt far beyond his native Alps. Among the chief attractions of
Einsiedeln was an image of the virgin which was said to have the
power of working miracles. Above the gateway of the convent was
the inscription, “Here may be obtained complete remission of sins.”
Pilgrims at all seasons resorted to the shrine of the virgin, but at the
great yearly festival of its consecration, multitudes came from all
parts of Switzerland, and even from France and Germany. Zwingle,
greatly afflicted at the sight, seized the opportunity to proclaim [175]

liberty through the gospel to these bond-slaves of superstition.
“Think not,” he said, “that God is in this temple more than in
any other part of creation. Wherever he has fixed your dwelling
he encompasses you, and hears you.... What power can there be
in unprofitable works, weary pilgrimages, offerings, prayers to the
virgin and the saints, to secure you the favor of God? What signify
the multiplying of words in prayer? What efficacy in the cowl
or shaven crown, or priestly garments falling, and adorned with
gold? God looks upon the heart—and our heart is far off from God.”
“Christ,” he said, “who offered himself on the cross once for all, is
the sacrifice and victim that satisfies for all eternity, for the sins of
all believers.”

To many listeners these teachings were unwelcome. It was a
bitter disappointment to them to be told that their toilsome journey
had been made in vain. The pardon freely offered to them through
Christ they could not comprehend. They were satisfied with the old
way to Heaven which Rome had marked out for them. They shrank
from the perplexity of searching for anything better. It was easier
to trust their salvation to the priests and the pope than to seek for
purity of heart.

But another class received with gladness the tidings of redemption
through Christ. The observances enjoined by Rome had failed
to bring peace of soul, and in faith they accepted the Saviour’s blood
as their propitiation. These returned to their homes to reveal to
others the precious light which they had received. The truth was
thus carried from hamlet to hamlet, from town to town, and the
number of pilgrims to the virgin’s shrine greatly lessened. There

was a falling off in the offerings, and consequently in the salary of
Zwingle, which was drawn from them. But this caused him only joy
as he saw that the power of fanaticism and superstition was being
broken.
[176] The authorities of the church were not blind to the work which
Zwingle was accomplishing; but for the present they forbore to
interfere. Hoping yet to secure him to their cause, they endeavored
to win him by flatteries; and meanwhile the truth was gaining a hold
upon the hearts of the people.

Zwingle’s labors at Einsiedeln had prepared him for a wider
field, and this he was soon to enter. After three years here, he was
called to the office of preacher in the cathedral at Zurich. This
was then the most important town of the Swiss confederacy, and
the influence exerted here would be widely felt. The ecclesiastics
by whose invitation he came to Zurich were, however, desirous
of preventing any innovations, and they accordingly proceeded to
instruct him as to his duties.

“You will use your utmost diligence,” they said, “in collecting
the revenues of the chapter—not overlooking the smallest item. You
will exhort the faithful, both from the pulpit and in the confessional,
to pay all dues and tithes, and to testify by their offerings the love
which they bear to the church. You will be careful to increase
the income that arises from the sick, from masses, and in general
from all ecclesiastical ordinances.” “As to the administration of the
sacraments, preaching, and personally watching over the flock,”
added his instructors, “these also are among the duties of the priest.
But for the performance of these, you may employ a vicar to act
in your stead,—especially in preaching. You are to administer the
sacraments only to persons of distinction, and when especially called
upon; you are not allowed to administer them indiscriminately to
people of all ranks.”

Zwingle listened in silence to this charge, and in reply, after
expressing his gratitude for the honor of a call to this important
station, he proceeded to explain the course which he proposed to
adopt. “The history of Jesus,” he said, “has been too long kept out
of the people’s view. It is my purpose to lecture upon the whole of
the Gospel according to St. Matthew, drawing from the fountains
[177] of Scripture alone, sounding all its depths, comparing text with

text, and putting up earnest and unceasing prayers, that I may be
permitted to discover what is the mind of the Holy Spirit. It is to the
glory of God, to the praise of his only Son, to the salvation of souls,
and their instruction in the true faith, that I desire to consecrate my

ministry.” Though some of the ecclesiastics disapproved his plan,
and endeavored to dissuade him from it, Zwingle remained steadfast.
He declared that he was about to introduce no new method, but the
old method employed by the church in earlier and purer times.
Already an interest had been awakened in the truths he taught;
and the people flocked in great numbers to listen to his preaching.
Many who had long since ceased to attend service were among
his hearers. He began his ministry by opening the Gospels, and
reading and explaining to his hearers the inspired narrative of the
life, teachings, and death of Christ. Here, as at Einsiedeln, he
presented the Word of God as the only infallible authority, and the
death of Christ as the only complete sacrifice. “It is to Christ,”

he said, “that I wish to guide you,—to Christ, the true spring of
salvation.” Around the preacher crowded the people of all classes,
from statesmen and scholars to the artisan and the peasant. With
deep interest they listened to his words. He not only proclaimed
the offer of a free salvation, but fearlessly rebuked the evils and
corruptions of the times. Many returned from the cathedral praising
God. “This man,” they said, “is a preacher of the truth. He will be
our Moses, to lead us forth from this Egyptian darkness.”
But though at first his labors were received with great enthusiasm,
after a time opposition arose. The monks set themselves to hinder
his work and condemn his teachings. Many assailed him with gibes
and sneers; others resorted to insolence and threats. But Zwingle
bore all with patience, saying, “If we would win souls to Christ, we
must learn to shut our eyes against many things that meet us in our
way.”

About this time a new agency came in to advance the work [178]
of reform. One Lucian was sent to Zurich with some of Luther’s
writings by a friend of the reformed faith at Basel, who suggested
that the sale of these books might be a powerful means of scattering
the light. “Ascertain,” he wrote to Zwingle, “whether this Lucian
possesses a sufficient share of discretion and address; if it shall
appear that he does, let him go from city to city, from town to


town, from village to village, nay, from house to house, all over
Switzerland, carrying with him the writings of Luther, and especially
the exposition of the Lord’s prayer written for the laity. The more
it is known, the more purchasers will it find.” Thus the light found
entrance.
At the time when God is preparing to break the shackles of
ignorance and superstition, then it is that Satan works with greatest
power to enshroud men in darkness, and to bind their fetters still
more firmly. As men were rising up in different lands to present to
the people forgiveness and justification through the blood of Christ,
Rome proceeded with renewed energy to open her market throughout
Christendom, offering pardon for money.

Every sin had its price, and men were granted free license for
crime, if the treasury of the church was kept well filled. Thus the two
movements advanced,—one offering forgiveness of sin for money,
the other forgiveness through Christ; Rome licensing sin, and making
it her source of revenue; the reformers condemning sin, and pointing
to Christ as the propitiation and deliverer.

In Germany the sale of indulgences had been committed to the
Dominican friars, and was conducted by the infamous Tetzel. In
Switzerland the traffic was put into the hands of the Franciscans,
under the control of Sampson, an Italian monk. Sampson had already
done good service to the church, having secured immense sums from
Germany and Switzerland to fill the papal treasury. Now he traversed
[179] Switzerland, attracting great crowds, despoiling the poor peasants
of their scanty earnings, and exacting rich gifts from the wealthy
classes. But the influence of the reform already made itself felt
in curtailing, though it could not stop, the traffic. Zwingle was
still at Einsiedeln when Samson, soon after entering Switzerland,
arrived with his wares at a neighboring town. Being apprised of his
mission, the reformer immediately set out to oppose him. The two
did not meet, but such was Zwingle’s success in exposing the friar’s
pretensions that he was obliged to leave for other quarters.
At Zurich, Zwingle preached zealously against the pardon-mongers,
and when Samson approached the place he was met by a
messenger from the council, with an intimation that he was expected
to pass on. He finally secured an entrance by stratagem, but was


sent away without the sale of a single pardon, and he soon after left
Switzerland.
A strong impetus was given to the reform, by the appearance
of the plague, or the “great death,” which swept over Switzerland
in the year 1519. As men were thus brought face to face with the
destroyer, many were led to feel how vain and worthless were the
pardons which they had so lately purchased; and they longed for a
surer foundation for their faith. Zwingle at Zurich was smitten down;
he was brought so low that all hope of his recovery was relinquished,
and the report was widely circulated that he was dead. In that trying
hour his hope and courage were unshaken. He looked in faith to
the cross of Calvary, trusting in the all-sufficient propitiation for sin.
When he came back from the gates of death, it was to preach the
gospel with greater fervor than ever before; and his words exerted
an unwonted power. The people welcomed with joy their beloved
pastor, returned to them from the brink of the grave. They themselves
had come from attending upon the sick and the dying, and they felt,
as never before, the value of the gospel.

Zwingle had arrived at a clearer understanding of its truths, and [180]
had more fully experienced in himself its renewing power. The fall
of man and the plan of redemption were the subjects upon which
he dwelt. “In Adam,” he said, “we are all dead, sunk in corruption
and condemnation.” “But Christ has purchased for us an everlasting
deliverance.” “His passion is an eternal sacrifice, and has a perpetual
efficacy; it satisfies the divine justice forever upon behalf of all who
rely upon it with a firm, unshaken faith.” Yet he clearly taught that
men are not, because of the grace of Christ, free to continue in
sin. “Wheresoever there is faith in God, there God himself abides;
and wheresoever God is, there is awakened a zeal which urges and
constrains men to good works.”

Such was the interest in Zwingle’s preaching that the cathedral
was filled to overflowing with the crowds that came to listen to
him. Little by little, as they could bear it, he opened the truth to his
hearers. He was careful not to introduce, at first, points which would
startle them and create prejudice. His first work was to win their
hearts to the teachings of Christ, to soften them by his love, and keep
before them his example; and as they should receive the principles of

the gospel, their superstitious beliefs and practices would inevitably
be overthrown.
Step by step the Reformation advanced in Zurich. In alarm its
enemies aroused to active opposition. One year before, the monk
of Wittenberg had uttered his “No” to the pope and the emperor
at Worms, and now everything seemed to indicate a similar withstanding
of the papal claims at Zurich. Repeated attacks were made
upon Zwingle. In the popish cantons, from time to time, disciples
of the gospel were brought to the stake, but this was not enough;
the teacher of heresy must be silenced. Accordingly the Bishop
of Constance dispatched three deputies to the Council of Zurich,
accusing Zwingle of teaching the people to transgress the laws of
the church, thus endangering the peace and good order of society. If

[181] the authority of the church were to be set aside, he urged, universal
anarchy would result. Zwingle replied that he had been for four
years teaching the gospel in Zurich, “which was more quiet and
peaceful than any other town in the confederacy.” “Is not then,” he
said, “Christianity the best safeguard of the general security?”
The deputies had admonished the councillors to continue in the
church, out of which, they declared, there was no salvation. Zwingle
responded: “Let not this accusation move you. The foundation of
the church is the same Rock, the same Christ, that gave Peter his
name because he confessed him faithfully. In every nation whoever
believes with all his heart in the Lord Jesus is accepted of God. Here,
truly, is the church, out of which no one can be saved.” As a result of
the conference, one of the bishop’s deputies accepted the reformed
faith.

The council declined to take action against Zwingle, and Rome
prepared for a fresh attack. The reformer, when apprised of the plots
of his enemies, exclaimed, “Let them come on; I fear them as the
beetling cliff fears the waves that thunder at its feet.” The efforts
of the ecclesiastics only furthered the cause which they sought to
overthrow. The truth continued to spread. In Germany its adherents,
cast down by Luther’s disappearance, took heart again, as they saw
the progress of the gospel in Switzerland.

As the Reformation became established in Zurich, its fruits were
more fully seen in the suppression of vice, and the promotion of
order and harmony. “Peace has her habitation in our town,” wrote
Swiss Reformer 153
Zwingle; “no quarrel, no hypocrisy, no envy, no strife. Whence can
such union come but from the Lord, and our doctrine, which fills us
with the fruits of peace and piety?”

The victories gained by the Reformation stirred the Romanists
to still more determined efforts for its overthrow. Seeing how little
had been accomplished by persecution in suppressing Luther’s work
in Germany, they decided to meet the reform with its own weapons.
They would hold a disputation with Zwingle, and having the ar- [182]
rangement of matters, they would make sure of victory by choosing,
themselves, not only the place of the combat, but the judges that
should decide between the disputants. And if they could once get
Zwingle into their power, they would take care that he did not escape
them. The leader silenced, the movement could speedily be crushed.
This purpose, however, was carefully concealed.

The disputation was appointed to be held at Baden; but Zwingle
was not present. The Council of Zurich, suspecting the designs of
the papists, and warned by the burning piles kindled in the popish
cantons for confessors of the gospel, forbade their pastor to expose
himself to this peril. At Zurich he was ready to meet all the partisans
that Rome might send; but to go to Baden, where the blood of
martyrs for the truth had just been shed, was to go to certain death.
Oecolampadius and Haller were chosen to represent the reformers,
while the famous Doctor Eck, supported by a host of learned doctors
and prelates, was the champion of Rome.

Though Zwingle was not present at the conference, his influence
was felt. The secretaries were all chosen by the papists, and others
were forbidden to take notes, on pain of death. Notwithstanding
this, Zwingle received daily a faithful account of what was said at
Baden. A student in attendance at the disputation, made a record
each evening of the arguments that day presented. These papers
two other students undertook to deliver, with the daily letters of
Oecolampadius, to Zwingle at Zurich. The reformer answered,
giving counsel and suggestions. His letters were written by night,
and the students returned with them to Baden in the morning. To
elude the vigilance of the guard stationed at the city gates, these
messengers brought baskets of poultry on their heads, and they were
permitted to pass without hindrance.
Thus Zwingle maintained the battle with his wily antagonists. [183]

“He has labored more,” said Myconius, “in meditating upon and
watching the contest, and transmitting his advice to Baden, than he
could have done by disputing in the midst of his enemies.”
The Romanists, flushed with anticipated triumph, had come to
Baden attired in their richest robes, and glittering with jewels. They
fared luxuriously, their tables spread with the most costly delicacies
and the choicest wines. The burden of their ecclesiastical duties was
lightened by gayety and reveling. In marked contrast appeared the
reformers, who were looked upon by the people as little better than
a company of beggars, and whose frugal fare kept them but short
time at table. Oecolampadius’ landlord, taking occasion to watch
him in his room, found him always engaged in study or at prayer,
and, greatly wondering, reported that “the heretic was at least very
pious.”

At the conference, “Eck haughtily ascended a pulpit superbly
decorated, while the humble Oecolampadius, meanly clad, sat facing
his adversary, upon a rudely constructed platform.” Eck’s stentorian
voice and unbounded assurance never failed him. His zeal was
stimulated by the hope of gold as well as fame; for the defender
of the faith was to be rewarded by a handsome fee. When better
arguments failed, he had resort to insults, and even to oaths.
Oecolampadius, modest and self-distrustful, had shrunk from the
combat, and he entered upon it with the solemn avowal, “I recognize
no other rule of judgment than the Word of God.” Though gentle
and courteous in demeanor, he proved himself able and unflinching.
While the Romanists, according to their wont, appealed for authority
to the customs of the church, the reformer adhered steadfastly to
the Holy Scriptures. “In our Switzerland,” he said, “custom is of no
force unless it be according to the constitution; now in all matters of
faith, the Bible is our constitution.”

[184] The contrast between the two disputants was not without effect.
The calm, clear reasoning of the reformer, so gently and modestly
presented, appealed to minds that turned in disgust from Eck’s boastful
and boisterous assumptions.

The discussion continued eighteen days. At its close, the papists
with great confidence claimed the victory. Most of the deputies sided
with Rome, and the Diet pronounced the reformers vanquished, and
declared that they, together with Zwingle, their leader, were cut off

from the church. But the fruits of the conference revealed on which
side the advantage lay. The contest resulted in a strong impetus to
the Protestant cause, and it was not long afterward that the important
cities of Bern and Basel declared for the Reformation.